Bibliography#

[1]

Vincent Deguin, Jo√ęlle Mascetti, Aude Simon, Nadia¬†Ben Amor, Christian Aupetit, Sandra Latournerie, and Jennifer¬†A. Noble. Photochemistry of fe:h2o adducts in argon matrixes: a combined experimental and theoretical study in the mid-ir and uv-visible regions. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 122:529‚Äď542, 1 2018. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.7b09681.

[2]

J. P. Hague, P. W. Mieczkowski, C. O'Rourke, A. J. Loughlin, and J. B. Phillips. Microscopic biophysical model of self-organization in tissue due to feedback between cell- and macroscopic-scale forces. Physical Review Research, 11 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043217.

[3]

Glauco R. Souza, Hubert Tseng, Jacob A. Gage, Arunmani Mani, Pujan Desai, Fransisca Leonard, Angela Liao, Monica Longo, Jerrie S. Refuerzo, and Biana Godin. Magnetically bioprinted human myometrial 3d cell rings as a model for uterine contractility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 4 2017. doi:10.3390/ijms18040683.

[4]

Joel¬†D. Goldhar. Obtaining and using information in the year 2002. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-20:126‚Äď129, 1977. doi:10.1109/TPC.1977.6592347.

[5]

Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Mercè Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier Dumon, Scott Edmunds, Chris T. Evelo, Richard Finkers, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Alasdair J.G. Gray, Paul Groth, Carole Goble, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Jaap Heringa, Peter A.C. t Hoen, Rob Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, Joost Kok, Scott J. Lusher, Maryann E. Martone, Albert Mons, Abel L. Packer, Bengt Persson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Roos, Rene van Schaik, Susanna Assunta Sansone, Erik Schultes, Thierry Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, Morris A. Swertz, Mark Thompson, Johan Van Der Lei, Erik Van Mulligen, Jan Velterop, Andra Waagmeester, Peter Wittenburg, Katherine Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, and Barend Mons. Comment: the fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3 2016. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.

[6]

Philip¬†E. Bourne, Timothy¬†W. Clark, Robert Dale, Anita de¬†Waard, Ivan Herman, Eduard¬†H. Hovy, and David Shotton. Improving the future of research communications and e-scholarship. Dagstuhl Manifestos, 1:41‚Äď60, 2012. URL: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2012/3445, doi:10.4230/DagMan.1.1.41.

[7]

Williams¬†E. Nwagwu and Bosire Onyancha. Back to the beginning - the journal is dead, long live science. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41:669‚Äď679, 9 2015. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.005.

[8]

Aileen Fyfe. Journals, learned societies and money: philosophical transactions, ca. 1750-1900. Notes and Records, 69:277‚Äď299, 2015. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2015.0032.

[9]

Heather Morrison, Luan Borges, Xuan Zhao, Tanoh¬†Laurent Kakou, and Amit¬†Nataraj Shanbhoug. Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011‚Äď2021. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73:1793‚Äď1805, 12 2022. doi:10.1002/asi.24717.

[10]

Paul Ginsparg. First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, 8:390, 1994. doi:10.1063/1.4823313.

[11]

Peter Swinnerton-Dyer. A system of electronic journals for the united kingdom. Electronic Journals for the United Kingdom, 1992.

[12]

Andrew¬†M. Odlyzko. Tragic loss or good riddance? the impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. Human-Computer Studies, 42:71‚Äď122, 1995.

[13]

Paul Ginsparg. Winners and losers in the global research village. Serials Librarian, 30:83‚Äď95, 1997. doi:10.1300/J123v30n03_13.

[14]

Jonathan¬†P. Tennant, Jonathan¬†M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, Damien¬†C. Jacques, Fran√ßois Waldner, Daniel Mietchen, Yehia Elkhatib, Lauren¬†B. Collister, Christina¬†K. Pikas, Tom Crick, Paola Masuzzo, Anthony Caravaggi, Devin¬†R. Berg, Kyle¬†E. Niemeyer, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Sara Mannheimer, Lillian Rigling, Daniel¬†S. Katz, Bastian¬†Greshake Tzovaras, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Nazeefa Fatima, Marta Poblet, Marios Isaakidis, Dasapta¬†Erwin Irawan, S√©bastien Renaut, Christopher¬†R. Madan, Lisa Matthias, Jesper¬†N√łrgaard Kj√¶r, Daniel¬†Paul O'Donnell, Cameron Neylon, Sarah Kearns, Manojkumar Selvaraju, and Julien Colomb. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6:1151, 7 2017. doi:10.12688/f1000research.12037.1.

[15]

Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 6 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.

[16]

William¬†H. Walters. Institutional journal costs in an open access environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58:108‚Äď120, 1 2007. doi:10.1002/asi.20441.

[17]

Alexander Grossmann and Björn Brembs. Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10:20, 2021. doi:10.12688/f1000research.27468.1.

[18]

Satrajit S. Ghosh, Arno Klein, Brian Avants, and K. Jarrod Millman. Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012. doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00018.

[19]

Björn Brembs, Katherine Button, and Marcus Munafò. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6 2013. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291.

[20]

Thierry Berghmans, A.¬†P. Meert, C.¬†Mascaux, M.¬†Paesmans, J.¬†J. Lafitte, and J.¬†P. Sculier. Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials. Annals of Oncology, 14:715‚Äď721, 5 2003. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg203.

[21]

Patrizio E. Tressoldi, David Giofré, Francesco Sella, and Geoff Cumming. High impact = high statistical standards? not necessarily so. PLoS ONE, 2 2013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056180.

[22]

R. Chris Fraley and Simine Vazire. The n-pact factor: evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PLoS ONE, 10 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109019.

[23]

Malcolm¬†R. Macleod, Aaron¬†Lawson McLean, Aikaterini Kyriakopoulou, Stylianos Serghiou, Arno de¬†Wilde, Nicki Sherratt, Theo Hirst, Rachel Hemblade, Zsanett Bahor, Cristina Nunes-Fonseca, Aparna Potluru, Andrew Thomson, Julija Baginskitae, Kieren Egan, Hanna Vesterinen, Gillian¬†L. Currie, Leonid Churilov, David¬†W. Howells, and Emily¬†S. Sena. Risk of bias in reports of in vivo research: a focus for improvement. PLoS Biology, 13:1‚Äď12, 10 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273.

[24]

Marcus R. Munafò, Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V.M. Bishop, Katherine S. Button, Christopher D. Chambers, Nathalie Percie Du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J. Ware, and John P.A. Ioannidis. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1 2017. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

[25]

Daniele Fanelli. Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? PNAS, 2018. URL: www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1708272114/-/DCSupplemental., doi:10.1073/pnas.1708272114/-/DCSupplemental.

[26]

Victoria Stodden, Jennifer Seiler, and Zhaokun Ma. An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115:2584‚Äď2589, 3 2018. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708290115.

[27]

Hans E. Plesser. Reproducibility vs. replicability: a brief history of a confused terminology. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 1 2018. doi:10.3389/fninf.2017.00076.

[28]

Dwight¬†J. Kravitz and Chris¬†I. Baker. Toward a new model of scientific publishing: discussion and a proposal. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, pages 1‚Äď12, 12 2011. doi:10.3389/fncom.2011.00055.

[29]

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Alexander Walther, and Diana Deca. An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11 2012. doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00094.

[30]

Paul Longley Arthur and Lydia Hearn. Toward open research: a narrative review of the challenges and opportunities for open humanities. Journal of Communication, 9 2021. doi:10.1093/joc/jqab028.

[31]

missing journal in Raym2006

[32]

Stewart Manley. On the limitations of recent lawsuits against sci-hub, omics, researchgate, and georgia state university. Learned Publishing, 32:375‚Äď381, 10 2019. doi:10.1002/leap.1254.

[33]

Brian VICKERY. A century of scientific and technical information. Journal of Documentation, 1999. URL: http://www.aslib.co.uk/aslib.

[34]

Peter Murray-Rust. Open data in science. Nature Precedings, 2008.

[35]

John¬†W.T. Smith. The deconstructed journal - a new model for academic publishing. Learned Publishing, 12:79‚Äď91, 1999. doi:10.1087/09531519950145896.

[36]

Thomas S. (Thomas Samuel) Kuhn. The structure of scientific revolutions. Volume 2. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 1970. ISBN 0226458032.

[37]

Jason Priem. Beyond the paper. Nature, 2013. doi:10.3998/3336451.0011.203.

[38]

Eti Herman, John Akeroyd, Gaelle Bequet, David Nicholas, and Anthony Watkinson. The changed ‚Äď and changing ‚Äď landscape of serials publishing: review of the literature on emerging models. Learned Publishing, 33:213‚Äď229, 7 2020. doi:10.1002/leap.1288.

[39]

Kristen L Garlock, William E Landis, and Sherry Piontek. Redefining access to scholarly journals: a progress report on jstor. Serials Review, 1997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-7913(97)90002-2.

[40]

Andrea Chiarelli, Rob Johnson, Stephen Pinfield, and Emma Richens. Preprints and scholarly communication: an exploratory qualitative study of adoption, practices, drivers and barriers. F1000Research, 2019. doi:10.12688/f1000research.19619.1.

[41]

Monica Marra. Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of arxiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. an initial survey. Information Services and Use, 37:371‚Äď387, 2018. doi:10.3233/ISU-170856.

[42]

Don Schauder. Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45:73‚Äď100, 1994. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199403)45:2<73::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-5.

[43]

Toma Susi and Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado. Replacing academic journals. Zenodo, 2021.

[44]

Amira La√Įfi and Emmanuel Josserand. Legitimation in practice: a new digital publishing business model. Journal of Business Research, 69:2343‚Äď2352, 7 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.003.

[45]

Anne¬†Katharina Weilenmann. A new paradigm for the scientific article. Information Services and Use, 34:315‚Äď319, 2014. doi:10.3233/ISU-140753.

[46]

Susanne Beck, Carsten Bergenholtz, Marcel Bogers, Tiare¬†Maria Brasseur, Marie¬†Louise Conradsen, Diletta¬†Di Marco, Andreas¬†P. Distel, Leonhard Dobusch, Daniel D√∂rler, Agnes Effert, Benedikt Fecher, Despoina Filiou, Lars Frederiksen, Thomas Gillier, Christoph Grimpe, Marc Gruber, Carolin Haeussler, Florian Heigl, Karin Hoisl, Katie Hyslop, Olga Kokshagina, Marcel LaFlamme, Cornelia Lawson, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Wolfgang Lukas, Markus Nordberg, Maria¬†Theresa Norn, Marion Poetz, Marisa Ponti, Gernot Pruschak, Laia¬†Pujol Priego, Agnieszka Radziwon, Janet Rafner, Gergana Romanova, Alexander Ruser, Henry Sauermann, Sonali¬†K. Shah, Jacob¬†F. Sherson, Julia Suess-Reyes, Christopher¬†L. Tucci, Philipp Tuertscher, Jane¬†Bj√łrn Vedel, Theresa Velden, Roberto Verganti, Jonathan Wareham, Andrea Wiggins, and Sunny¬†Mosangzi Xu. The open innovation in science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 29:136‚Äď185, 2022. doi:10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274.

[47]

Sascha Friesike and Thomas Schildhauer. Open science: many good resolutions, very few incentives, yet. Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations, pages 277‚Äď289, 1 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_17.

[48]

Angela Okune, Rebecca Hillyer, Denisse Albornoz, Alejandro Posada, and Leslie Chan. Whose infrastructure? towards inclusive and collaborative knowledge infrastructures in open science. x, 2016.

[49]

A.¬†M. Price-Whelan, B.¬†M. SipŇĎcz, H.¬†M. G√ľnther, P.¬†L. Lim, S.¬†M. Crawford, S.¬†Conseil, D.¬†L. Shupe, M.¬†W. Craig, N.¬†Dencheva, A.¬†Ginsburg, J.¬†T. VanderPlas, L.¬†D. Bradley, D.¬†P√©rez-Su√°rez, M.¬†de¬†Val-Borro, T.¬†L. Aldcroft, K.¬†L. Cruz, T.¬†P. Robitaille, E.¬†J. Tollerud, C.¬†Ardelean, T.¬†Babej, Y.¬†P. Bach, M.¬†Bachetti, A.¬†V. Bakanov, S.¬†P. Bamford, G.¬†Barentsen, P.¬†Barmby, A.¬†Baumbach, K.¬†L. Berry, F.¬†Biscani, M.¬†Boquien, K.¬†A. Bostroem, L.¬†G. Bouma, G.¬†B. Brammer, E.¬†M. Bray, H.¬†Breytenbach, H.¬†Buddelmeijer, D.¬†J. Burke, G.¬†Calderone, J.¬†L.¬†Cano Rodr√≠guez, M.¬†Cara, J.¬†V.¬†M. Cardoso, S.¬†Cheedella, Y.¬†Copin, L.¬†Corrales, D.¬†Crichton, D.¬†D‚ÄôAvella, C.¬†Deil, √Č.¬†Depagne, J.¬†P. Dietrich, A.¬†Donath, M.¬†Droettboom, N.¬†Earl, T.¬†Erben, S.¬†Fabbro, L.¬†A. Ferreira, T.¬†Finethy, R.¬†T. Fox, L.¬†H. Garrison, S.¬†L.¬†J. Gibbons, D.¬†A. Goldstein, R.¬†Gommers, J.¬†P. Greco, P.¬†Greenfield, A.¬†M. Groener, F.¬†Grollier, A.¬†Hagen, P.¬†Hirst, D.¬†Homeier, A.¬†J. Horton, G.¬†Hosseinzadeh, L.¬†Hu, J.¬†S. Hunkeler, ŇĹ.¬†Ivezińá, A.¬†Jain, T.¬†Jenness, G.¬†Kanarek, S.¬†Kendrew, N.¬†S. Kern, W.¬†E. Kerzendorf, A.¬†Khvalko, J.¬†King, D.¬†Kirkby, A.¬†M. Kulkarni, A.¬†Kumar, A.¬†Lee, D.¬†Lenz, S.¬†P. Littlefair, Z.¬†Ma, D.¬†M. Macleod, M.¬†Mastropietro, C.¬†McCully, S.¬†Montagnac, B.¬†M. Morris, M.¬†Mueller, S.¬†J. Mumford, D.¬†Muna, N.¬†A. Murphy, S.¬†Nelson, G.¬†H. Nguyen, J.¬†P. Ninan, M.¬†N√∂the, S.¬†Ogaz, S.¬†Oh, J.¬†K. Parejko, N.¬†Parley, S.¬†Pascual, R.¬†Patil, A.¬†A. Patil, A.¬†L. Plunkett, J.¬†X. Prochaska, T.¬†Rastogi, V.¬†Reddy Janga, J.¬†Sabater, P.¬†Sakurikar, M.¬†Seifert, L.¬†E. Sherbert, H.¬†Sherwood-Taylor, A.¬†Y. Shih, J.¬†Sick, M.¬†T. Silbiger, S.¬†Singanamalla, L.¬†P. Singer, P.¬†H. Sladen, K.¬†A. Sooley, S.¬†Sornarajah, O.¬†Streicher, P.¬†Teuben, S.¬†W. Thomas, G.¬†R. Tremblay, J.¬†E.¬†H. Turner, V.¬†Terr√≥n, M.¬†H. van Kerkwijk, A.¬†de¬†la Vega, L.¬†L. Watkins, B.¬†A. Weaver, J.¬†B. Whitmore, J.¬†Woillez, and V.¬†Zabalza. The astropy project: building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package. The Astronomical Journal, 156:123, 8 2018. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f, doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f.

[50]

Ch√©rifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Hans Dillaerts, Thierry Lafouge, Pascal Bador, and Aude Sauer-Avargues. French publishing attitudes in the open access era: the case of mathematics, biology, and computer science. Learned Publishing, 31:345‚Äď354, 10 2018. doi:10.1002/leap.1169.

[51]

Ali Tarhini, Kate Hone, and Xiaohui Liu. Factors affecting students‚Äô acceptance of e-learning environments in developing countries:a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, pages 54‚Äď59, 2013. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2013.v3.233.

[52]

Paul Juinn Bing Tan. Applying the utaut to understand factors affecting the use of english e-learning websites in taiwan. SAGE Open, 11 2013. doi:10.1177/2158244013503837.

[53]

Lori¬†S. Mestre. Student preference for tutorial design: a usability study. Reference Services Review, 40:258‚Äď276, 5 2012. doi:10.1108/00907321211228318.

[54]

Patrice Potvin and Abdelkrim Hasni. Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at k-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50:85‚Äď129, 1 2014. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626.

[55]

Su¬†Swarat, Andrew Ortony, and William Revelle. Activity matters: understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49:515‚Äď537, 4 2012. doi:10.1002/tea.21010.

[56]

Feng Li. The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: a holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 4 2020. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004.

[57]

Roger¬†D. Peng. Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334:1226‚Äď1227, 12 2011. doi:10.1126/science.1213847.

[58]

George Koutsouris, Lauren Stentiford, Simon Benham-Clarke, and David Hall. Agonism in education: a systematic scoping review and discussion of its educational potential. Educational Review, 74:1029‚Äď1054, 7 2022. doi:10.1080/00131911.2021.1889983.

[59]

Gary¬†H. Merrill. Ontology, ontologies, and science. Topoi, 30:71‚Äď83, 4 2011. doi:10.1007/s11245-011-9091-x.

[60]

Chan jong Im and Do¬†wan Kim. Semi-automatic ontology construction from html documents: a conversion of text-formed information into owl 2. International Journal of Contents, 12:24‚Äď30, 6 2016. doi:10.5392/ijoc.2016.12.2.024.

[61]

missing journal in Ruiz-Iniesta2008

[62]

Jorge¬†Calmon de¬†Almeida¬†Biolchini, Paula¬†Gomes Mian, Ana Candida¬†Cruz Natali, Tayana¬†Uch√īa Conte, and Guilherme¬†Horta Travassos. Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21:133‚Äď151, 4 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2006.11.006.

[63]

Giulia Panzarella, Pierangelo Veltri, and Stefano Alcaro. Using ontologies for life science text-based resource organization. Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences, 3:100059, 12 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ailsci.2023.100059.

[64]

Stuart J. Chalk. Scidata: a data model and ontology for semantic representation of scientific data. Journal of Cheminformatics, 10 2016. doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0168-9.

[65]

Kamran Munir and M.¬†Sheraz Anjum. The use of ontologies for effective knowledge modelling and information retrieval. Applied Computing and Informatics, 14:116‚Äď126, 7 2018. doi:10.1016/j.aci.2017.07.003.

[66]

Lorena Otero-Cerdeira, Francisco¬†J. Rodr√≠guez-Mart√≠nez, and Alma G√≥mez-Rodr√≠guez. Ontology matching: a literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 42:949‚Äď971, 2 2015. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.032.